Where do you stand on intuition, time and the limits of the human mind?
Dr Mossbridge’s work asks whether the human mind is only reactive, or whether it may also be anticipatory, and what that says about our comfort with uncertainty. These ideas are explored further in a video featuring Dr Bialik in conversation with Dr Mossbridge, embedded in this article.
Dr Julia Mossbridge occupies a space that makes many people uncomfortable, not because her credentials are weak, but because the questions she asks refuse to stay neatly inside disciplinary boundaries.
Formally trained in cognitive neuroscience, Mossbridge holds advanced degrees from institutions including Northwestern University and the University of California, San Francisco. Her academic grounding lies in perception, communication sciences and the neuroscience of cognition, and her early career followed a conventional scientific path rooted in mainstream research.
What distinguishes her work is not a rejection of scientific method, but a willingness to examine data that does not fit comfortably within existing explanatory models. Much of her research has focused on how the human brain and nervous system process time, particularly whether physiological or cognitive responses can, under certain conditions, precede future events. This line of inquiry, often referred to as anticipatory or presentiment research, has been explored under controlled conditions and discussed in peer-reviewed contexts, even while remaining controversial.
Mossbridge is careful about how these findings are framed. She does not present her work as evidence of supernatural ability, nor does she argue that intuition should replace evidence-based reasoning. Her position remains measured: the data exists, the mechanisms are unclear, and the questions deserve continued examination rather than dismissal.
Beyond academic debate, her work resonates with people who feel mentally overloaded or constrained by narrow definitions of cognition. She has spoken about the strain constant stimulation places on attention and filtering, and how sustained cognitive demand can leave individuals exhausted without a clear explanation. Her emphasis on lived experience reflects an interest in how people actually process information, rather than how they are categorised.
She is also explicit about limits and responsibility.
Mossbridge has cautioned that exploring intuition or non-ordinary cognition without grounding can be destabilising, and she consistently stresses the importance of psychological balance, ethical awareness and critical thinking. Her work does not advocate abandoning structure, but expanding inquiry carefully and deliberately.
Her interdisciplinary collaborations span neuroscience, psychology and physics, and her co-authored book Transcendent Mind attracted attention for questioning whether material explanations alone are sufficient to account for consciousness, rather than rejecting material science outright.
Academic profile of Dr. Julia Mossbridge
At its core, Mossbridge’s work raises a difficult but necessary question: what if the human mind is not only reactive, but also anticipatory in ways we do not yet fully understand? Where one stands on that question often reveals less about Mossbridge herself and more about one’s tolerance for uncertainty, and how comfortable one is sitting with questions that do not yet have clear answers.
🔴 You might also like to read:
Liz Thorne
Liz Thorne
